EVOLUTION AT MULTIPLE LOCI:
LINKAGE and SEX
Chapter 8 in the 4th edition, Chapter 7 in the 3rd.
DOWNLOAD
an Adobe Acrobat version of the Sections 8.1, 8.2 Linkage outline
DOWNLOAD
an Adobe Acrobat version of the Sections 8.3 Sex outline
DOWNLOAD
an old Microsoft Word version of the chapter outline
review
questions
7.1 EVOLUTION at TWO LOCI:
LINKAGE EQUILIBRIUM and LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM
- linkage can involve any pair of loci in an organism’s genome
- physical linkage of two loci on
the same chromosome [Fig. 7.1]
- two locus version of Hardy-Weinberg tracks both allele and chromosome
frequencies
- Haplotype: multilocus genotype of a chromosome or a gamete
(haploid genotype)
- Linkage disequilibrium determines whether selection at one locus
affects allele and genotype frequencies at another locus
A Numerical Example
- Two populations, both with the same allele frequencies:
- Fr(A)=0.6,
Fr(a)=0.4,
- Fr(B)=0.8, Fr(b)=0.2
- One Population is in Linkage Equilibrium; the other, in Linkage
Disequilibrium
-
- A population is in linkage equilibrium (with respect to loci A and B) if
an individual's genotype at locus A is independent of the individual's
genotype at B [Fig. 7.2a]
- in linkage equilibrium
- frequency of allele B on allele A chromosomes = Fr(B) on allele a
chromosome
- Fr (AB haplotype) = Fr(A)*Fr(B), etc.; e.g. Fr(AB chromosomes) =
0.6*0.8
- knowing the genotype at one locus is of no use in predicting the
genotype at another locus
- Independent Assortment and Crossing Over
-
- linkage disequilibrium
- There is a nonrandom association between a chromosome’s genotype at
one locus and its genotype at another locus (e.g., A and B)
- Frequency of allele B on A chromosomes is not equal to
Fr (B on a) [Fig. 7.2b]
- Knowing the genotype at one locus makes it possible to predict the
genotype at another locus
The Two-Locus Version of Hardy-Weinberg Analysis
- in linkage equilibrium, under H-W assumptions, chromosome frequencies
remain unchanged from generation to generation.
- in linkage disequilibrium, chromosomes frequencies change (they will
move closer to equilibrium each generation)
What Creates Linkage Disequilibrium in a Population?
- Selection on multilocus genotypes[Fig. 7.3]
- Genetic drift[Fig. 7.4]
- Population admixture[Fig. 7.5]
Linkage Disequilibrium and Selection
- Figure 7.3a: linkage equilibrium.
- Fr(AABB) = Fr(AB)*Fr(AB) = 0.48*0.48 = 0.2304, etc.
- Figure 7.3b: linkage disequilibrium
- individuals with fewer than 3 dominant alleles are removed
- survivors are in linkage disequilibrium
What Eliminates Linkage Disequilibrium from a Population?
- The effect of sexual reproduction with random mating is to reduce the
level of linkage disequilibrium in populations (Figs. 7.6, 7.7).
- Linkage equilibrium or disequilibrium affects the evolution of the
population.
Why does Linkage Disequilibrium Matter?
- If the population is in linkage equilibrium, selection at one locus is
independent of selection at other loci.
- If a population is in linkage
disequilibrium, selection at one locus also changes the allele or genotype
frequencies at one or more other loci.’ [Fig. 7.8]
A Practical Reason for Measuring Linkage Disequilibrium
- Where did the CCR5-Δ32
allele come from? [Fig. 7.9]
- two neutral loci near the CCR5 locus are close to linkage equilibrium
[Fig 7.9]
- linkage disequilibrium between CCR5 and its adjacent neutral loci
originated from genetic drift
- a mutation forming the CCR5-Δ32
allele occurred on a chromosome with a Δ32-197-215
haplotype and was strongly selected for
- Estimating the age of the CCR5-Δ32
mutation [Box 7.4, Fig. 7.9]
- decrease of linkage disequilibrium to its present rate would have
taken 275 to 1875 years, best estimate 700 years ago.
- Genetic bottleneck from smallpox or bubonic plague favored the Δ32
mutation
7.2 THE ADAPTIVE SIGNIFICANCE of SEX
- Linkage disequilibrium is reduced by sexual reproduction with random
mating
- Many species are capable of both sexual and asexual reproduction
(aphids, Volvox, hydra [Figs. 7.11, 7.12]).
- parthenogenesis: reproduction from unfertilized eggs
Which Reproductive Mode is Better? Sexual or Asexual
- null model (Maynard Smith, 1978) has two assumptions
- number of offspring a female can produce depends only on the
amount of food she can gather, not her mode of reproduction
- The probability that an offspring will survive to reproduce does
not depend on whether that offspring was produced sexually or asexually
- Difficulties and Costs Associated with Sexual Reproduction
- costs in time, energy, increased predation risk
- sexual reproduction is slower than asexual. The fraction of the
population that are asexual females increases every generation. [Fig. 7.13]
- costs of meiosis: offspring only share half of each parent's genes.
if the environment is stable the recombinant offspring may not
be well adapted.
- Maynard Smith's first assumption is violated by species in which
males contribute to raising offspring. However, in most species,
including mammals, males only contribute genes. Maynard Smith's first
assumption is correct.
- Maynard Smith's second assumption is not correct. Under some
conditions, descendants produced by sexual reproduction have a higher
fitness than descendants produced by asexual reproduction. Experiment
with flour beetles shows this [Fig. 7.14].
- sex reduces linkage disequilibrium.
Genetic Drift, in Combination with Mutation, Can Make Sex Beneficial
-
asexual reproduction leads to accumulation of deleterious alleles (genetic
load), which can cause extinction.
-
Mueller's ratchet (Fig. 7.15).
- Experimental demonstration (Fig. 7.16): bacterial populations
subjected to periodic bottlenecks over 1700 generations.
- Muller's ratchet is long-term, requires many generations
to accomplish
Selection Imposed by a Changing Environment Can Make Sex Beneficial
RED QUEEN HYPOTHESIS (Van Valen)
- To avoid extinction, a population must constantly evolve in response to
the changing environment: physical and biotic pressures (predation,
parasites, competition, availability of prey or food plants, etc.).
- Sex is a short-term adaptation to rapid environmental
change.
- Sex recreates now-favorable multilocus genotypes that were recently
eliminated by selection and sexual reproduction is therefore strongly
selected for.
- Evolutionary Arms race
- Parasites and their hosts are engaged in a constant
struggle, with the host evolving defenses and the parasite evolving
mechanisms to counter the host's defenses. A parasite might select in
favor of a certain multilocus genotype in one generation, and in favor
of a different multilocus genotype in another generation. [Fig. 7.17]
- Parasites have been suggested as selective agents for sex. A higher
proportion of female snails (Potamopyrgus antipodarum, in
New Zealand) are of the sexual type in populations with a high incidence
of parasitism from trematodes. [Fig. 7.18]
Return to: